Skip to content

BUG: fix for datetime parse error for more than 50 rows #55411

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

rsm-23
Copy link
Contributor

@rsm-23 rsm-23 commented Oct 5, 2023

This issue seems to be caused due to the fix provided in #45319 . I have added kind of a check but the implementation doesn't seem very clean to me. Would be open to any suggestions. TiA!

@rsm-23 rsm-23 requested a review from MarcoGorelli as a code owner October 5, 2023 11:07
@mroeschke mroeschke added the Datetime Datetime data dtype label Oct 5, 2023
@rsm-23
Copy link
Contributor Author

rsm-23 commented Oct 16, 2023

@MarcoGorelli can I please get a little help here? I am kind of stuck.

@MarcoGorelli
Copy link
Member

hey - looks like tests are failing - I'd suggest stepping through a debugger to figure out where things might be going wrong

@mroeschke
Copy link
Member

Thanks for the pull request, but it appears to have gone stale. If interested in continuing, please merge in the main branch, address any review comments and/or failing tests, and we can reopen.

@mroeschke mroeschke closed this Nov 7, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Datetime Datetime data dtype
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

BUG: datetime parsing: error message indicating position of conflicting string is wrong for larger data
3 participants